User talk:LXM-994

Deletion Notices
My main issue is with canonicity. There has recently been a huge influx of articles on various Narnian species, most of which have little/no plot involvement, and many of which are not mentioned in the books. Though it is great to have more articles on the wiki, we need to put quality over quantity, and the fact is that the material in many of these articles are not necessary or relevant. As for such articles as 'snaketaurs', 'mammothtaurs' and the likes, these are not seen in the books, and if they do exist in adaptations, they are not at all important. I am sorry that I have put deletion notes on some of your articles, it is nothing personal. Poggin 20:25, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * In accord with Poggin's aforementioned statements, some of your pages will be deleted due to their conjecture-based titles and uncanonical texts. Making articles is encouraged but do not create articles for creatures that are never mentioned in the books and that do not play a prominent enough role in the movies to even have a name. Thank you. Wolfdog: Narnia Wiki administrator 20:03, 6 May 2009 (UTC)