Talk:Demon

Concerned
Is this canon??? Poggin 22:10, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

i am not sure if it is cannon. i did not wright this but i think it is interesting.Animalfriend

This article is seriously messed up. This is hardly "canon", apparent by the parts "who could use black magic or were made out of this magic themselves" and "most were originally spawned from the curses created by evil magicians or other sorcerers in order to carry out sinful deeds". Eh, what? This article also mixes canon and non-canon by listing both canon and non-canon creatures by WETA, but then the whole definition of "demon" falls short, as there never is any give in canon. This is mostly a list of creatures that are more on the evil side in Narnia, nothing more. Either rename it and remove the whole definition of "Demon", or delete it altogether. ReepI 23:42, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Yes its kinda cannon, so let it last as long as we dont know the true name of the creatures, or just let me copy it into my PC in word, and save it until we gets a name and a purpose for please, dear sir. Iam owner of a wiki myself called DeltoraQuest.wikia.com, and I handle it pretty well, as I created masterpieces of great article like the one called Ols.

-In faith, your friend

-Lukas S.

Yes kinda, but listen here my friend:
Yes its kinda cannon, so let it last as long as we dont know the true name of the creatures, or just let me copy it into my PC in word, and save it until we gets a name and a purpose for please, dear sir. Iam owner of a wiki myself called DeltoraQuest.wikia.com, and I handle it pretty well, as I created masterpieces of great article like the one called Ols.

-In faith, your friend

-Lukas S.

Eh, the whole classification of "Demons" and the description of it is non-canon, as never given in any of the books.

Also, the description of most of these seems to have been made up, rather than being drawn from any of the books or the movies (as for example with the cruels, cyclops, ghouls, orknies) ReepI 12:37, May 24, 2010 (UTC)