Talk:Cliffhorn

Deletion decision on this page is tied to Stonehorn. Please see Talk:Stonehorn for further discussion. Lasaraleen Tarkheena (talk) 17:35, August 24, 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure. If the video games should take a backbench, why not the movie fodder? But there definitely should be a notice of some kind, built especially just for the games, if only to tell the difference. Storyseeker1 (talk) 00:29, August 25, 2012 (UTC)


 * I feel that there is nothing more obscure than the video games; this is why the video games get the "backbench" as opposed to the movies, which are more well known than the books (though I think not as good). If everyone wants to delete the video game-only characters, I'll do it.

Clearly, movie canon has to stay because it's so well-known (and already wiki policy). So, since we are going to include the movies, we may as well include as much information about them as we can (including info about the "fodder" characters). The same goes for the video games: IF we want any information from them, I think we should allow articles about every aspect of them, not just the major characters and scenes. The question before us is whether they should be allowed at all. The problem I see with including them is this: Where do we stop? Right now, the wiki has information from books and movies. If we include video games, why not the little pop-up kids' book I have that summarizes each of the chronicles, or the "young reader" version of LWW that may change a few details from the original book? What about widely read fan-fiction? Anything creative users come up with? Clearly, we need to draw a line somewhere, and I would suggest that we stick with just the movies and the books. Maybe we could include an out-of-universe page about the video game itself and a few references to its characters in trivia sections, but I don't think it should be considered a "historical" source about the world of Narnia. Lasaraleen Tarkheena (talk) 01:05, August 25, 2012 (UTC)