Talk:Mr. Fox

In response to your earlier edit, you said, "The heading "Adaptions" allows differences between the book and movie to be discussed from an OOU perspective without a movie or OOU template. The movie template is for articles whose subjects are movie canon only (eg, Green Mist)."

The movie note specifically says: -

Which is exactly what the information concerning the movie fox was all about. The character of Mr. Fox in the movie is nothing like the one in the book. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that he was a completely different character altogether. Therefore, all information concerning him is movie based, hence where this note comes in, and should be included at the part where it says "Film Adaption", describing that all info from that point on is all movie based.

And considering that it is all about the movie, the title heading should say "Film Adaption".

One of the original admins used this note for describing movie based info in several pages. Storyseeker1 (talk) 02:40, September 4, 2013 (UTC)

According to sections IV(c) and V(d) of the WikiFormat, the movie template is to be used for full articles that discuss movie-universe topics. The reason I keep pushing for "Adaptions" over "Film Adaption" is that it is consistent with WikiFormat (IV(c)) and it allows us to be more standardized. Lasaraleen Tarkheena (talk) 23:53, September 4, 2013 (UTC)

What other adaptions are there? I've already told you that the first admins used it to describe the movie parts of the characters/sections of the story. It separates the sections, allowing readers to determine which parts are that of the book, and which parts are that of the movie. Your way is too confusing. Storyseeker1 (talk) 12:29, September 5, 2013 (UTC)