Talk:Snowflake

Dumb Beast
In response to Storyseeker1's edit summary: "I hate the word 'dumb.'"

I didn't change it back, although I think maybe we should. "Dumb" as Lewis uses it is the opposite of Talking, not of Smart, and Dumb Beast is the canon term for non-Talking Beasts.Lasaraleen Tarkheena (talk) 00:54, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

I don't really care if Lewis used it or not. I HATE that word! Storyseeker1 (talk) 01:10, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

What about it do you hate? ~Las 01:41, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

It's a word used to describe someone or something that is just plain well stupid. I find it very insulting, as a lot of animals are smarter than they appear. Plus, I had a friend at school whose sister had Down's Syndrome. Dumb, dumbass and such were a lot of the neighbourhood kid's fave nicknames for her, so needless to say it's not a fave word of mine. Storyseeker1 (talk) 02:01, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

I get that, but of course Lewis didn't use the word to mean stupid, but rather unable to speak. In the same way, he called Reepicheep "a gay and marshal mouse" and Puzzle an "ass." Like these words have gained new, less socially acceptable meanings, dumb has come to be used as an insult, but Lewis certainly did not mean any offense to people with Down's Syndrome. Nor do I. In fact, his dumb beasts could also be noble and kind in their own ways--e.g., Reepicheep's ancestors and even Snowflake herself, whom Rilian calls "noble." All the same, I think "Dumb Beasts" may be the best term we have for animals to whom Aslan did not give the ability to speak. It is the term Lewis uses, and English doesn't have another concise way to say "unable to speak Beasts." I don't think "Dumb" is offensive enough to enough people that we should try to avoid using it despite its canonicity and efficiency, and I can't find any reasonable alternatives. Can you think of anything? Lasaraleen Tarkheena (talk) 03:11, December 31, 2012 (UTC)